Nope not at all, not in love, but discovered some interesting websites that have love as the main subject!

While browsing through the Fototarget forum i stumbled on an interesting thread ([link]), romanians may be interested!
Everything is fine so far, but... at one point i find a link to a blog that has a list of seven professional photography wedding websites. I never thought that wedding photography websites can be so dynamic, reason for which they managed to get attention, real fast.

Before i go any further here is the link to the post where you can see the list. Be shure to check the websites as well, you won't regret it: [link]

The never ending battle, digital versus film!

Digital photography allows us to be more creative rather than film photography, where you can't get immediate results, but film is still the leader, because of its superior quality over digital. Where am i trying to get with this? I seen digital and film wedding photos and unlike digital on film you are not allowed to make mistakes. If you use film, you have to be not good, but a very good photographer, because a wedding can be more than dynamic. Regarding mistakes, i was not referring to common mistakes such as fitting the people in the photos, but more to the economical side. Film photography can be more than expensive, in order to have the best photos you need the full ghear: chemicals, dark room, chemicals, film, film... Making too many photos can be a loss, and amateurs (i am not an exception) tend to make many photos, repeat the same photo over and over again. Digital is where photography takes the big leap. Imediatly after taking the photo you can see, the results(and take the next photos fast and easy) for example, working with jpg file types can be lossy, but the size is just about right(less quality, but a good photographer can improve), there is more speed; RAW files (my favorite) take a bit long to process and can take a lot of space, however the quality is outstanding. I forgot to mention at film photography, that a photographer can move with great ease, but it can also force him to think twice before taking the shot!(which can be both an advantage and a disadvantage, you choose). Working with digital can allow the storage of about 900 photos, on film this is a crime for the photographers finances.

I'm not against digital, i embrace it, and i am not against film, but film still is the king. Unfortunately film is a luxury!

There are a lot of things that remain unsaid, so feel free to complete this, or correct me if i am wrong in any way!

Last but not least, member of :